Discussions

Well its a good question with several nuances in reply. It probably would help to start by knowing what you think it means in the buddhist context.

However i'll give it a shot first off.

First i think its best to realise that closest translation to what the buddha probably meant is ignorance. john Peacock says as much but he thinks many people feel insulted by the word. they shouldn't.

In the buddhist context the basic meaning being referred to by ignorance as in greed aversion and ignorance means ignorance of the teachings of the buddha and ignorance of what the buddha is trying to get people to know. The word delusion is used but even so the meaning intended is exactly the same so i think its best to stick with the right choice of word.

once i heard it said that when someone acts badly it can be put down to ignorance of the dharma. Not just in not knowing about the dharma but in not knowing by experience and firsthand the knowledge that the dharma wants to convey.

for example, when a person is violent or angry towards another its becuase they are ignorant of not self and out interconnectedness. you see? If one were not ignorant; if one truly knew not-self, one would definitely want to restrain any violent or aggressive tendency or maybe not even have any violent or aggressive impulse in the first place.

so that's what's really meant by delusion aka ignorance.

However using the word delusion is also useful. So i use both. I like the word delusion to convey the more mundane aspect of the buddhist path. To not see things correctly but to always be putting our own distorted overlay on the way we see what's going on in the world.

There are actually at least two sets of words that represent three related issues:

As Candol points out, there's one that includes aversion: attraction (raga), aversion (patigha), ignorance (avijja). There's also one that has greed (lobha), hatred (dosa), and delusion (moha). You can see that we could match these up like this:

greed=attraction
hatred=aversion
ignorance=delusion

But that doesn't actually mean that ignorance is the exact equivalent of delusion. Nor is attraction, necessarily, greed. But greed certainly derives from attraction, just as hatred comes out of aversion, so in this way we can see that delusion is a by-product of ignorance.

Ignorance is ignorance of the reasons for the way so much of what we do results in dukkha. Delusion is the "what we do" that results in dukkha. It is us thinking the world works in a certain way, when it doesn't. More to the point, I think, delusion is pointing out that we think we know how the world works, when we are missing what becomes obvious once it is pointed out to us.

Yes, "driven by" works great.

Quote from Dana Nourie on August 19, 2012, 10:43
I'd see those equal signs as equal....

I agree. I set it up that way so I could refute myself. : )