Mixing things up here, today we’ll get into questions from a couple of viewers. One involves whether there is room for a kind of deep secular Buddhist practice akin to monasticism, and another deals with the way I’ve been editing these videos. Please let me know your thoughts as well in the comments below!

No Comments

  1. Jennifer Hawkins on July 6, 2017 at 1:07 pm

    I’m so glad you did this video. It’s good to hear that I’m not the only Secular Buddhist who is interested in monasticism. I think Monastic Academy (Vermont) is probably the friendliest place for us right now, but for some reason they are not accepting women full-time right now. (They have in the past and will again in the future – I believe there’s an issue with housing.) Otherwise, there have been more Secular Buddhists who have joined existing monasteries, as you noted. But if we want something that will be more open or focused on our form of interaction with the Dhamma, I think that ultimately, we will have to build it for ourselves. And that is something that, someday, I’d like to be a part of. And again, we’d have to talk about how to support such an institution because I have given thought to it and a monastic (of almost any background) might starve in North America just because of the cultural conditions.

    As for editing, I have no problem with it although the music during your discussion of monasticism was probably a little too relaxing (for a talk instead of a sit or something).

    • Doug Smith on July 6, 2017 at 1:26 pm

      Thanks for the comments, Jennifer. Yes, I think at least secular monasticism is a discussion we should have. It won’t be right for most folks but maybe someday could be a live option for those few.

      As for the music, it’s an ongoing experiment, like all things with the videos. ? Unfortunately it’s tough to find much royalty free music, and what there is out there tends to be quite short (couple of minutes long) or totally inappropriate for my video style. There’s also the problem that it takes a lot of time to listen through dozens of different pieces … Upshot is that I’m choosing from an imperfect, limited palette of options, knowing that I won’t please everyone.

      I’ll probably do a Q&A later on asking about the music, see what folks think generally, but not for a few weeks. ?

      • Jennifer Hawkins on July 7, 2017 at 8:58 pm

        Don’t worry yourself too much. People should be more grateful for what you’ve given freely and not seriously nit pick things like your video quality.

        Anyways, if you’re really interested, I know this is royalty free:

        I believe the soundtrack to Oblivion (the game) is also royalty free and is very atmospheric. It’d be fun to meditate to. That said, I agree with redkelpee on the part of not necessarily even needing music.

        Thank you for putting these out for free. <3

  2. redkelpee on July 6, 2017 at 9:41 pm

    The vids are great Doug. No probs with choppy edits – much better taking out ums and ers than reducing content. FWIW, I’m a music-lover but music isn’t really necessary in the vids apart from intros and outros. Unless it’s a video about Buddhist views on music or about music and meditation.

    • Doug Smith on July 7, 2017 at 5:20 am

      Thanks for the comments redkelpee, eventually I’d like to get to a place where I just say fewer ums and ers, but meanwhile I’ll aim to take out the more egregious examples. ?

      As for the music, yeah it isn’t really necessary and I may eventually just forego it completely. We’ll see. My thought is that if it keeps people more engaged and watching longer then it’s a good thing. Of course, if it becomes a distraction then not. Consider it a few-month experiment.

  3. Gavin McC on July 24, 2017 at 3:13 am

    Hi, I like the content of the videos, but I would also massively prefer if they were not edited in this choppy manner, I find it very distracting. Thanks!

    • Doug Smith on July 24, 2017 at 4:25 am

      Thanks Gavin, I hear you. There are still a number of videos in the can that will be kind of choppy, and anyway it’ll take me a bit more practice to get better, but I’ll be aiming in that direction going forward. ?

  4. Gavin McC on July 24, 2017 at 3:21 am

    By the way, I also enjoy the Secular Buddhist podcasts, but I think these too would benefit from having the music removed at the end. I actually quite like the tune, but I often practice some kind of meditation while listening, and when this very upbeat music comes in at the end, at quite a loud volume too (much louder than the interview volume) it is pretty jarring! I would suspect there may be many listeners who feel the same way. I think there is no need for these jingles in fact, because this is not a radio programme so it is unnecessary to clearly signpost the beginning and end of a show. Hope you don’t mind me mentioning this here, I’m very grateful to you guys for helping to create a more secular approach to Buddhism.

    • Ted Meissner on July 26, 2017 at 6:17 am

      Hi, Gavin, thanks for the input. The volume issue is most likely my fault when it appears, as I sometimes handle the mixing when our professional sound guy Anthony Dominello isn’t available.

  5. Michael Finley on July 27, 2017 at 3:55 pm

    “Don’t know if this is really relevant to lay monasticism, but 🙂

    My Life in Robes
    After a while/You can’t tell/If it’s missing a woman/Or needing/A cigarette/And later on/If it’s night/Or day/Then suddenly/You know/The time/You get dressed/You go home/You light up/You get married

    The Lovesick Monk
    I shaved my head/I put on robes/I sleep in the corner of a cabin/sixty-five hundred feet up a mountain/It’s dismal here/The only thing I don’t need/is a comb

    —- Leonard Cohen

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.